Last Update: Thursday, May 23, 2013
|CSU Board OK's Contingency Fees Hike|
|Written by San Fernando Valley Sun|
|Thursday, 20 September 2012 03:18|
LONG BEACH (CNS) – The California State University Board of Trustees has approved a 5 percent tuition hike that would only be implemented if Proposition 30 is rejected by voters in November.
The board approved a "contingency" plan on Wednesday, Sept. 19, aimed at covering an anticipated $250 million hit to the 23-campus system's budget if the tax initiative – championed by Gov. Jerry Brown – is defeated.
The plan includes a 5 percent increase in CSU tuition, which equates to another $150 per semester for in-state students for a total of $3,135. The increase would take effect in January.
Nonresident students would see a 7 percent increase in the tuition supplement fee they pay on top of regular tuition, effective in the fall of 2013. That equates to a roughly $810 per year increase, according to CSU.
The increases would only be implemented if Proposition 30 fails on the November ballot. The initiative would increase the state sales tax by a quarter-cent on the dollar for four years and raise the income tax on annual earnings over $250,000 for seven years. The bulk of the proceeds would be earmarked for education.
If the initiative fails, it would trigger more state budget cuts, including $250 million for the Long Beach-based CSU system.
The tuition hike would raise about $58 million per semester, with the balance of the loss being covered by planned increases in employees' healthcare contributions, a series of system-wide cost-cutting measures and specific cuts at each of the campuses.
CSU Chancellor Charles Reed had also proposed three additional student fees, but the Board of Trustees' Finance Committee delayed any decision on them until November. Those fees were a $372 per unit fee for seniors who have already earned 150 semester units; a $100 per unit fee for students who are repeating a course; and a $200 per unit fee for any course load of 17 or more units. The fees were projected to raise $35 million a year.
Board member Bernadette Cheyne tried unsuccessfully to eliminate the planned increase in employee health-care contributions, saying the move could be devastating for some workers.
"Before we take a vote I believe we need to know what all of those implications are," she said.
Reed said immediate board action was essential on the issue, because it still needs to be negotiated with employee unions – potentially a yearlong process. "We can't continue to kick the can down the road," he said.
The board rejected Cheyne's effort and approved the healthcare proposal.
|Last Updated on Thursday, 20 September 2012 03:19|